<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><!-- generator="wordpress/2.2.2" -->
<rss version="2.0" 
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/">
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Are you an evangelical?</title>
	<link>http://youthministrytv.com/2007/01/22/are-you-an-evangelical/</link>
	<description></description>
	<pubDate>Tue, 22 May 2012 06:22:51 +0000</pubDate>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=2.2.2</generator>

	<item>
		<title>By: wayne gooden</title>
		<link>http://youthministrytv.com/2007/01/22/are-you-an-evangelical/#comment-2191</link>
		<author>wayne gooden</author>
		<pubDate>Tue, 23 Jan 2007 13:54:06 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid>http://youthministrytv.com/2007/01/22/are-you-an-evangelical/#comment-2191</guid>
		<description>just found you site ... putting an HT back from ours. enjoyed reading about your work. hopefully we can meet sometime.

thanks

wayne gooden</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>just found you site &#8230; putting an HT back from ours. enjoyed reading about your work. hopefully we can meet sometime.</p>
<p>thanks</p>
<p>wayne gooden</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: adam</title>
		<link>http://youthministrytv.com/2007/01/22/are-you-an-evangelical/#comment-2167</link>
		<author>adam</author>
		<pubDate>Mon, 22 Jan 2007 19:21:17 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid>http://youthministrytv.com/2007/01/22/are-you-an-evangelical/#comment-2167</guid>
		<description>My guess would be that since there was a "barna" tongue lashing published on Christianity Today's website a few weeks ago... they felt the need to try to vindicate themselves. 

http://www.christianitytoday.com/bc/2007/001/5.11.html

While not mentioned by name... and technically "The Bridger Generation" (which the article notes) was a publication of a NAE staffer... it's clear that the gloves are coming off. 

Interesting stuff!</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>My guess would be that since there was a &#8220;barna&#8221; tongue lashing published on Christianity Today&#8217;s website a few weeks ago&#8230; they felt the need to try to vindicate themselves. </p>
<p><a href="http://www.christianitytoday.com/bc/2007/001/5.11.html" rel="nofollow">http://www.christianitytoday.com/bc/2007/001/5.11.html</a></p>
<p>While not mentioned by name&#8230; and technically &#8220;The Bridger Generation&#8221; (which the article notes) was a publication of a NAE staffer&#8230; it&#8217;s clear that the gloves are coming off. </p>
<p>Interesting stuff!</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>

